The above assumes OCV 2. The third panel shows a miss, assuming the target DCV is taken into account. See pages 94-95 of the Basic book for details.
The above assumes OCV 2. The third panel shows a miss, assuming the target DCV is taken into account. See pages 94-95 of the Basic book for details.
Margin (of success) covers the DCV use case explicitly. When we support targeting and attack automation, being more explicit makes sense.
Until then, margin of success = DCV hit as well as being useful for contests of skills or for when the GM doesn't want to reveal the difficulty of a task (or the DCV of the opponent).
Example: an OCV 7 character that executes a Killing Strike maneuver (-2 OCV) automatically calculates to a 16- roll, and the result calculates the margin of success (which = DCV) accurately. Tested with mulitple OCVs and maneuvers and no errors detected.
Enhancement.
Margin (of success) covers the DCV use case explicitly. When we support targeting and attack automation, being more explicit makes sense.
Until then, margin of success = DCV hit as well as being useful for contests of skills or for when the GM doesn't want to reveal the difficulty of a task (or the DCV of the opponent).
Example: an OCV 7 character that executes a Killing Strike maneuver (-2 OCV) automatically calculates to a 16- roll, and the result calculates the margin of success (which = DCV) accurately. Tested with mulitple OCVs and maneuvers and no errors detected.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
The above assumes OCV 2. The third panel shows a miss, assuming the target DCV is taken into account. See pages 94-95 of the Basic book for details.
With a target roll of 14, the attacker total OCV is 3, no ?
So with a roll score of 10, it hits target with DCV 4 or less. Am I wrong ?
Enhancement.
Margin (of success) covers the DCV use case explicitly. When we support targeting and attack automation, being more explicit makes sense.
Until then, margin of success = DCV hit as well as being useful for contests of skills or for when the GM doesn't want to reveal the difficulty of a task (or the DCV of the opponent).
Example: an OCV 7 character that executes a Killing Strike maneuver (-2 OCV) automatically calculates to a 16- roll, and the result calculates the margin of success (which = DCV) accurately. Tested with mulitple OCVs and maneuvers and no errors detected.
Then "Margin" should be replaced by "DCV Hit". As it stands it is confusing.